INTERVIEW PRACTICE FOR THE AI-NATIVE ERA

Practice AI-native
coding interviews

Code with an AI assistant, explain your decisions to a live interviewer, and get a timestamped report on how you actually performed.

Backend Interview  /  Build a URL Shortener API
27:14 remaining5/7 passingAI patch proposed
shortener.py
1 from fastapi import HTTPException
2 async def create_short_url(payload):
3     if not payload.url.startswith(("http://", "https://")):
4         raise HTTPException(422, "Invalid URL")
5     key = await generate_key()
6     async with repository.lock(key):
7         await repository.save(key, payload.url)
8     return {"short_url": f"/{key}"}

10 # Candidate owns final review
VISIBLE TESTS✓ creates a short URL✓ rejects malformed URL✕ prevents duplicate key writesExpected 409, received 500 · race under concurrent requests
Review AI patchAI suggests a change. Review the diff before it lands.
01 / CHOOSE

Choose realistic backend tasks

Practice on small repo-style backend tasks, not toy whiteboard problems.

FastAPI + pytestURL shortener API30 min
Fastify + VitestInventory service30 min
Django RestTeam invitation flow35 min
Express implementationRate-limit middleware30 min
Auth defectsSession refresh route30 min
Edge casesOrder invariant suite35 min
02 / COLLABORATE

Code with AI, but stay accountable

Use AI like you would in a real AI-forward interview. The platform tracks whether you reviewed, tested, and understood the changes.

AI coding assistant · Candidate-controlled

I found a validation race that can create duplicate keys under concurrency.

PROPOSED PATCH- await repository.save(key, url)+ async with repository.lock(key):+  await repository.save(key, url)
03 / DEFEND

Defend your decisions out loud

A live voice interviewer follows the work, applies time pressure, and asks for reasoning—not narration.

Voice interviewer● LIVE
“Walk me through why this patch is safer under concurrency.”
YOUR ANSWER

The lock makes key generation and persistence one atomic decision...

04 / IMPROVE

Get an evidence-based report

Every score is tied to hidden tests, patch decisions, debugging behavior, and timestamped voice evidence.

Performance reportSession · URL Shortener API
PERFORMANCE SCORE82Strong ownership

You reviewed AI output, caught a contract regression, and explained the final tradeoff.

Correctness
86
AI collaboration
78
Prompting quality
74
Code review judgment
88
Debugging
81
Communication
84
Time management
69
Overreliance risk
22
Timeline evidence
04:12

Asked AI to inspect validation boundaries

11:36

Rejected patch that changed API contract

18:42

Accepted lock after reviewing diff

22:18

Explained concurrency tradeoff aloud

27:09

Ran final visible test suite

Hidden tests12 / 14 passed

✓ URL normalization
✓ Collision retry
✓ Repository failure handling
✕ Burst concurrency
✕ Expired key cleanup

Simple practice credits

Start with one complete interview. Buy more only when you are ready to practice again.

Free

1 interview credit
  • Curated public problems
  • Basic report
Start free

Starter

3 interview credits
  • 1 custom generation
  • Report history
Choose Starter

Prep

10 interview credits
  • 5 custom generations
  • Report history
Choose Prep

Built around ownership, not autopilot

The candidate stays responsible for every accepted change, every test run, and every explanation.

01

Patch review is explicit

No silent assistant edits. Every proposed change is inspectable and reversible.

02

Scores cite evidence

Reports connect feedback to hidden tests, voice answers, and timestamped actions.

03

Interview pressure feels real

A 30-minute session with visible tests, tradeoffs, and follow-up questions.

Stop practicing like AI is banned.

Practice the new skill: using AI while proving you still own the work.

Start free interview One free interview credit · No card required